Srinagar, J&K: While Jammu and Kashmir reels under its worst-ever power crisis, with a staggering 2,000 MW deficit, a recent decision to utilize its hydroelectric resources for other states has ignited a heated debate.
With reservoirs running low, damaged transmission infrastructure, and surging demand, residents grapple with extended daily power cuts, disrupting routine life and impacting businesses. Despite efforts like importing electricity and increased thermal power generation, the gap remains immense.
This is where the outsourcing of hydropower resources comes into play. Proponents argue it's a logical response to regional power shortages, citing surplus generation capacity in J&K during certain seasons. They believe sharing resources can foster national unity and address critical needs elsewhere.
However, critics fear this move deprives J&K residents of their rightful entitlement to reliable electricity, especially during harsh winters. They question the fairness of prioritizing external needs while local communities struggle. Concerns around transparency in resource allocation and long-term economic implications for J&K also resonate.
The issue isn't just about power; it's about priorities and perceptions. While the government emphasizes a national responsibility to share resources, J&K residents feel overlooked and burdened by their own internal crisis. Finding a solution will require navigating complex considerations, addressing anxieties, and ensuring equitable distribution of vital resources within and beyond the state's borders.
The debate surrounding J&K's hydropower is far from over. As winter's grip intensifies, so does the demand for answers. Striking a balance between national obligations and ensuring local well-being remains a crucial challenge, one that demands open dialogue, transparency, and a commitment to ensuring equitable access to power for all.
