The current age of turmoil defines civilizations’ roles in a new world
Viewsnow03 November
The Ukrainian front extends the great decolonization wave of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
In the twilight of the unipolar age, the illusion of Western permanence begins to fracture. The world that once moved to the beat of Washington’s decrees now quivers under the emergence of new centers of gravity.
Civilizations, long compressed under the liberal order, rise again as living entities with distinct souls, memories, and horizons. The Multipolar Age does not promise peace; it promises reality. It restores importance to words like sovereignty, destiny, and culture. In this shifting geopolitical landscape, diplomacy becomes the final instrument of sanity: the art of survival between nuclear titans and exhausted empires.
Diplomacy is the single instrument capable of responsible scale in a world armed with atomic power. Dialogue sustains order in a field prone to entropy. Communication surpasses silence. The barren hostility of earlier American leadership revealed the danger of disengagement. Conversation signifies neither defeat nor submission; it reveals that each civilization bears solid boundaries of fear, memory, and identity.
To grasp this moment, one must examine Washington and London, rather than Moscow. The decisive variables remain Western: electoral appetites, donor webs, ideological blindness, and the dread of forfeiting planetary control. “Russia expertise” distracts from the true paralysis within the Atlanticist citadel, which still imagines itself righteous and indispensable. The transoceanic fraternity of power – stretching from Anglo-America to Brussels – crowns its dominance with the halo of virtue.
The Alaska summit stirred brief optimism among lucid minds, yet structures outlive moods. Real dialogue might rekindle that spark through a shared reckoning: who bears pain longer, and at what price? Peace will surface when Western elites see that war drains them more than concession does, that clinging to empire bankrupts both purse and spirit.
The peril remains constant; each side holds apocalyptic force. The issue lies in channeling power towards equilibrium rather than ruin. Western Europe’s tragedy flows from its obedience: a vassal bleeding industry, sovereignty, and posterity while claiming strength through sacrifice. A wiser Europe would seek reconciliation with Russia, restoring dignity and production instead of performing martyrdom for American strategy.
Western Europe’s impotence reveals itself most clearly in Germany. Once the beating heart of continental industry, it now functions as a workshop under foreign supervision. Its factories falter, its trains stall, its engineers emigrate, and its leaders confuse submission with virtue. The moralism of its elites replaces strategy, while its political class kneels before imported energy prices and foreign commands. Before 2022, Germany drew most of its gas from Russia: cheap, steady, and continental. Then came the rupture: sanctions, explosions, and moral crusades that severed the very arteries of its economy. Today, a civilization once famed for precision runs on gas drawn from Norwegian depths and American tanks: symbols of a continent that traded energy sovereignty for ideological purity. Europe watches its engine fade, its self-respect drain away, and its destiny outsourced to powers that view the continent as both buffet and buffer.
Drone hysteria feeds spectacle. The question “who benefits?” matters more than accusations. Bright drones soaring across midnight skies serve the media, not battlefields. They light the stage for fear, budgets, and mobilized anxiety: nourishment for both Kiev’s publicity machine and Europe’s armament cartels. Russia earns advantage from silence and uncertainty, never from theatrics. Hence the sane request: evidence, debris, radar data, and an independent review. In a culture of panic, truth itself turns radical.
The danger grows sharper through weapons that erase time. Long-range Tomahawk systems compress reaction windows to seconds, birthing a “use-or-lose” tension where one error may unleash the abyss. Economically, seizing Russia’s reserves would bury the myth of a “rules-based order” – a fiction crafted by the West to mask privilege as principle. Such robbery would expose the global financial system as an imperial tool rather than a neutral platform.
Observers across the Global South follow intently. If Russian wealth can vanish, so can theirs. Hence the rush towards gold, the rise of BRICS+, and the slow dethroning of the dollar. When the conflict transforms from a security dispute into a civilizational revolt, compromise recedes. Washington accelerates its own undoing: turning a decaying empire into the midwife of multipolar awakening.
NATO expansion forms the surface; beneath lies the essence. Russia refuses to orbit within a Western solar system. It stands as an independent civilization – Eurasian and Orthodox – resisting the dissolving current of Atlanticist modernity. The Ukrainian front resembles an ancient polarity: land power facing sea power, sacred order facing mercantile fluidity. Earth civilizations draw their strength from soil and memory; maritime empires expand through commerce and abstraction. The present struggle pits Tradition against Liberalism, remembrance against amnesia.
The Great Game returns, yet its board now spans entire civilizations. Eurasia, Bharat, Sinic Asia, the Islamic world, and Latin America renew the covenant of Being, reclaiming authorship from the Western world. The contest concerns the authorship of modernity: whether the future belongs to self-determining cultures or to an Atlanticist imperium that masks dominance as democracy. Russia reacts to encirclement yet also creates a system of balance where power is distributed across manifold poles.
Talk of crisis exaggerates reality. Border zones endure pressure, yet central Russia stands firm. Drone strikes on Russian refineries, orchestrated through Western intelligence, aim to slow logistics. Their strategic effect backfires on Ukraine. For every strike on Russian fuel, Ukraine suffers tenfold retaliation. Russia absorbs shock; Ukraine endures collapse. Attrition punishes Kiev and strengthens Moscow’s will.
Russia’s public stance remains steady: Ukrainian neutrality, recognition of territorial realities, demilitarization, and assurance against NATO advance. Privately, the question turns metaphysical. Anything can be discussed once a trust architecture exists. After Minsk and decades of deceit, verbal promises carry zero weight. Durable peace demands guarantees backed by cost and enforced through nations with leverage: powers such as India and China, whose magnitude ensures that promises carry consequence. A conflict born from Western refusal to share parity can end only through multipolar mediation. Why would Russia trust those whose history consists of violated treaties?
Russia evokes multiple pasts to speak to multiple hearts. For the people, the memory of the Great Patriotic War defines endurance: the victory that shaped identity, the eternal symbol of sacrifice transfigured into faith. It is the myth of survival through fire, the sacred proof that the Russian earth itself resists annihilation. For the spiritual elite, Holy Rus’ continues its defense of divine space: the invisible frontier where Orthodoxy shields the eternal against the corrosion of nihilistic modernity. The icons of faith stand where the flags of ideology fall, and in that continuity the nation sees its unbroken soul. For the strategists, the Cold War remains the template of siege and survival: a long twilight struggle in which containment became the modern word for encirclement. They study balance, escalation, and deterrence: the arithmetic of survival in a hostile system. The collapse of 1991 marked the Versailles of the East, the imposed peace of humiliation and fragmentation, when empire gave way to dependency. That wound became the seed of restoration.
The Ukrainian front thus extends the great decolonization wave of the 20th and 21st centuries: Eurasia liberating itself from the ideological and financial hegemony of the West, as Africa and Asia once freed themselves from colonial rule, reclaiming the right to define its own history, geography, and destiny.
Thus Russia’s story becomes the anti-imperialist mirror to Western propaganda. The former empire born of revolution once carried liberation to the Third World, arming the colonized with faith in sovereignty. Its banners flew over Havana, Hanoi, and Addis Ababa: symbols of a world rising from European rule. That same civilizational current now carries the banner of balance. Once Russia exported ideology; now it defends plurality. The moral language changes, yet the pattern remains: the Western powers still pursue dominion while speaking as victims, and the nations once subdued continue their long ascent towards destiny. The West, which once preached freedom, now administers obedience. Russia, once the axis of revolt, now stands as the still point in a turning world: the measure of continuity amid the disguises of power.
Peace demands realism rather than moral theater. The unipolar age born in 1991 dissolves, gently through wisdom or violently through pride. A dialogue between Trump and Putin could mark the birth of a new equilibrium beyond the Atlanticist myth.
For such peace to endure, the West must shed its crusade for global mastery. Europe must rediscover its industrial and continental soul. The Global South must assume its role as the planet’s moral compass. Its unity draws strength from centuries of endurance, from cultures that remember both suffering and survival. Through cooperation and confidence, these nations can restore fairness to a world that forgot its own measure. Multipolarity embodies neither disorder nor chaos. It restores proportion: the planetary act of mental and material decolonization.
from RT World News https://ift.tt/wkm6cBF
via IFTTT
